sci.physics

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
>
> >
> >
> > > For example
> > >
> > > .......000000002 - .......9999999 = (-) ......9999997
> > >
> > > Another example
> > >
> > > 5....00000000 - 49.....999999 = .....000001
> >
> > This is not a well-defined operation, since you could also have
> >
> > 50....0000000 500....00000
> > - 4....9999999 OR - 4....99999
> > _______________ ____________
> > 46....0000001 496....00001
> >
>
> You do not understand Front loaded P-adics representation versus Rear
> loaded
> P-adics
>
> The numbers 5.....0000000 and 4....999999 have to occupy the same
> point at infinity
> of the "5" and "4". You cannot scoot around the front digit.
>

I wanted to go to bed early tonight. Early for me is 1am because I
want to pour some
concrete tomorrow. But an active mind and curious mind never seems to
tire. (Shame
that an automobile tire is spelled the same as sleep tire.)

Anyway after making the above post some hours earlier tonight I went
away
thinking about the number 04.....9999999 and the number 004....999999.
They are
P-adics since they are a possible digit arrangement as per the
definition of P-adic
as all possible digit arrangements of infinite leftward strings.

And this post is another historic mathematics post, and historic for
all human
thought, because it changes our understanding of mathematics and
physics.
Because I am happy to announce I can count from 1 to .....9999999

It took me 14 years to arrive at this post, because I started the idea
that Counting
Numbers are the P-adics in 1993. In the decade of the 1990s I tried to
prove the
Counting Numbers were the P-adics and I did it by showing the Peano
Axioms were
flawed. But the trouble with that is that noone will believe me or
accept the assertion that

P-adics equals the Counting Numbers

or

P-adics are one and the same as the Natural Numbers

No matter how I showed the Peano Axioms are flawed and contradictory,
noone
is going to believe the P-adics are the Counting Numbers until the day
I show how
to count from 1 to .....9999999. Well, it is 2007, some 14 years from
1993, and I am
happy and proud to announce that I can count from 1 to ....999999 and
thus proving
beyond doubt that the P-adics are the Counting Numbers.

What allows me to show this is the Front View Representation of P-
adics and the
idea that there is an angle equal to every P-adic number. That the
Euler Identity
of (e)^ 2(pi)(i) = 1 gives us the fact that ......99999999 is approx
180 degrees

So, while taking a bathe before going to bed, I had the realization
that I could now
count all the P-adics in a sequence or progression from 1 to .....
999999

The idea came from those strange numbers of 004...9999999. So what
angle is
that number if 9....99999 is approx 180degrees and shy of 180 degrees
by one unit
distance away from the South Pole as -0.

So what angle is the number 004...999999? And the answer lies in this:

+0 is 0 degrees
1.....00000000 is approx 10 percent of 180 degrees
2.....0000000 is approx 20 percent of 180 degrees
3....00000000 is approx 30 percent of 180 degrees
4.....00000000 is approx 40 percent of 180 degrees
5.....0000000 is approx 50 percent of 180 degrees
6....00000000 is approx 60 percent of 180 degrees
7.....00000000 is approx 70 percent of 180 degrees
8.....0000000 is approx 80 percent of 180 degrees
9....00000000 is approx 90 percent of 180 degrees

So a P-adic such as any ending in 0s such as .....0000000231
which we know of as the Counting Number 231 , all of those with zeroes
are in the 0 degrees to 10 percent of 180 degrees

The P-adic of .....77777 is front view loaded as 7...7777 and thus is
about
77 percent of 180 degrees.

What is the angle of 004....9999999 ?

Well it is in the range of 0 to that of 1....000000 and thus the
number
004...9999999 is less than 10 percent of 180 degrees.

By the ability of giving an angle for every P-adic and the ability to
tell which P-adic is
larger than another P-adic allows me to count all the P-adics in a
sequence from
1 to 9...99999999

In the 1990s when I showed how flawed and contradictory the Peano
Axioms were, there
was no way that anyone was going to believe me, as long as I was
unable to Count the
P-adics from 1 to ....999999. Today I can do that.

I can tell you which of two P-adics is larger and then assign a degree
angle.

This textbook has many new important discoveries, but this one
probably tops them
all.

Archimedes Plutonium
/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies