sci.physics

a_plutonium wrote:
> Referring to this mapp of the cosmos of galaxies and especially the
> Sloan Great Wall and the other Great Wall
> /~mjuric/universe/
>
> Chapters of this book and this is chapter (5)
> Observational and experimental support
> (5) density and distribution of galaxies
>

Let me add the Luminet team of recent discovery that the Universe is a
dodecahedron shape:

/cws/article/news/18368

And let me add to this mix the Great Attractor where all the galaxies
seem to be moving
into that direction (what the Atom Totality would say is the Nucleus
of the Cosmos)

And let me add a picture of the 5f6 electron-dot-cloud of plutonium as
seen in the book:
THE ELEMENTS BEYOND URANIUM, Seaborg & Loveland, 1990 and page 73.

Now looking at page 73 of those lobes of the 5f6 and image oneself
near the far end of one of those
lobes as planet Earth and looking towards the Nucleus that you would
see a Great Wall of galaxies
and then the curvature of the lobe would indicate the Nucleus of the
Cosmos where the Great
Attractor is presently pointing to and emerging on the other side of
these lobe, you would see
another dense concentration of galaxies which we now see as the Sloan
Great Wall. and beyond
the Sloan Great Wall are more dense galaxies but thinning out the
further one goes.

So what I am illustrating with these pictures is that astronomy is
looking at the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality as the area where the Great Attractor exists and before
you reach the Great
Attractor you enter the dense concentration of the Great Wall. This is
one lobe as illustrated
on page 73. Going further beyond the Great Wall and Great Attractor we
enter the second
lobe starting with Sloan Great Wall.

If the Big Bang were true, you would not see any of this, but rather
instead a uniform density
throughout the Cosmos. You would not see a geometrical structure and
you would not see
concentrated density and then a smoothed thinning out.

What we see as the Cosmos is that the concentration of galaxies
matches the concentration
of the dots of the electron-dot-cloud of an atom.

Now I want to say something about the Luminet referenced website for
it has been bothering me for
some months now as to why the 5f6 has six lobes whereas Luminet team
is describing the 5f6 as
a dodecahedron. The faces of a cube is six, and the number of faces of
a dodecahedron is 12. I suspect
my qualms are answered if I consider that if I built a huge 6 lobed
figure to where I could sit on top of a
lobe and look in the direction of the center and on beyond to the next
lobe that each lobe describes a
set of two boundaries. What I would call 2 edges for each lobe. So
there are 6 lobes and each has
2 edges thus making for a total of 12 edges. So that when the Luminet
team calles the Cosmos as
a dodecahedron, it is fitting properly with the calling of the Cosmos
as a 6 lobed entity. So the geometry
of a 6 lobed atom matches the geometry of a dodecahedron.


Archimedes Plutonium
/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies