sci.physics.particle

On Feb 20, 9:53=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Feb 19, 10:38 pm, "" <...@> wrote:
>
> > > > > 2
> > > > they could not understand that
> > > > =A0NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !!
>
> > > > =A0(which should be one of the basics of physics
> > > > and a more powerful 'lithmus paper' to examine
> > > > quickly if a theory makes physics sense
> > > > or jsut a fairy tale =A0! =A0(spelling for 'tale ' =A0taile ?? )
> > > > ie nonsens physics
> > > > anyway
> > > > =A0years later =A0even Gisse =A0 &Co will get it
> > > > but he wil claime that that is** his** innovation.. =A0(:-)
>
> > > > ATB
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------
>
> > > What a blithering idiot. You still don't get that E =3D mc^2 isn't val=
id
> > > for moving objects.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > -----------------
> > imbecil parrot
> > so what is that c there??
>
> > have you heared about
> > INTRINSIC MOVEMENT ??
>
> > doe s a little fucker like you what toteachme
> > about the structure of matter and energy
> > and mass problems ??
> > just whipe out the milk from your stupid arrogant face
>
> What are you even trying to say? Your gibberish has improved - nobody
> knows what the hell you are talking about.
>
>
>
>
>
> > ATB
> > - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

----------------
of course you cant understand
you cant understand anything that is not in your textbook

(what has all that got to do with my English crooky??)

and your parrot teachers
(may be the white bears of Alaska ??)
what might be intrinsic movement
inside the Atom that gives it its internal energy
2
tell your bears of Alaska that
ENERGY IS MASS IN MOVEMENT
no matter how you turn it around
3
satrt understanding physics before mathematics
got it little 24 years parrot??

(generally young people are less parrots then you are
they have an open criticising mind)


--------------------------------