sci.physics

On Feb 29, 8:04=A0pm, Igor wrote:
> On Feb 29, 2:35=A0am, "" <...@> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 11:19=A0am, "Artful" wrote:
>
> > > "" <...@> wrote in message
>
> > >news:27568a56-0c3f-443e-acdb-ba355cffb9e3@.=
..
>
> > > > so thje formula shoul not be
>
> > > > E=3Dgamma m =A0 times c^2
>
> > > > but ....
>
> > > > E/Gamma =3D mc^2 !!
>
> > > That is the same formula .. just written slightly differently.
>
> > > > AND m REMAINS =A0 =A0 COOOOOOOONSTANT =A0 !! =A0(:-)
>
> > > It is constant 9assuming you are talking about the one object) in both=

> > > formulas. =A0'm' means mass (rest mass or invariant mass) .. it doesn'=
t
> > > change. =A0rewriting the formula does not make any difference whatsoev=
er ..
> > > except that the formula you propose is less useful in that neither sid=
e
> > > directly gives you a meaningful value (ie most useful formulas have a =
single
> > > symbol on one side, and an expression on the other side that calculate=
s the
> > > value for that =A0formula.
>
> > ----------------
> > thas exactly the point !!
>
> > =A0IT IS THE SAME FORMULA WITH A BASICALLY
> > DIFFERENT PHYSICAL UNDERSTANDING!!
>
> And you're physical understanding is certainly different.- Hide quoted tex=
t -
>
> - Show quoted text -

---------------
yess indeed
and some people already told me that
i am an orriginal thinker

now just wtite it before you
who told you that for the first time !!
and please dont forget .....


------------------------------------