Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Mar 2, 1:54 am, Eric Gisse
>> On Mar 1, 8:53 pm, Koobee Wublee <...@> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 25, 7:47 am, Tom Roberts wrote:
>>>> The best model we have for the propagation of light near a massive
>>>> object like the sun is GR, in which the curvature of spacetime is the
>>>> important aspect in determining the path light follows. And it agrees
>>>> with measurements to part-per-million accuracy over an enormous range.
>>> First, derive a set of geodesic equations a massed particle traveling
>>> at high speed near the sun. Then, gradually reducing the mass to zero
>>> and increasing the speed to c, do you see a discontinuity at mass = 0
>>> and speed = c?
>>> As you know, the geodesic equations are independent of mass. What
>>> does that tell you when the model predicts a 1x deflection traveling
>>> at speed just a hair below c and suddenly jumps to 2x deflection at
>>> speed = c?
>> Show us the mathematics in which this "2x deflection" appears, along
>> with a consistent and clear definition of the terms.
>
> Just look in your books. Don't tell you collect them just to sit on.
In other words Koobee Wublee cannot defend his "assertion".