sci.physics.relativity

On 1 Oct, 23:57, HW@....(Clueless Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:59:35 +0100, "George Dishman" wrote:
> >"Clueless Henri Wilson" wrote in message news:46c1g3lg94c1r8rs6oe3dsr6hai5ma48qm@ ...
>
> >>>> SR is DEAD.
>
> >>>Your diagram confirms it is correct, the post
> >>>below identifies your error.
>
> >>>> >> See latest thread.
>
> >>> /2q523r
>
> >> There is no error George....get used to it.
>
> >It is wrong Henry.
>
> >> ...and there's more coming....
>
> >No doubt, and probably also wrong.
>
> Is the ring gyro analysis wrong too George?

Yes, you used the wavelength when you should
have used the distance travelled per period.

> It has become quite obvious to me now that the sagnac effect operates purely
> ballstically..

Your digrams prove the opposite, and it shows how
poor your maths is when the fact that you get two
different answers for the phase difference using
two different methods to calculate the same number
didn't suggest that there must be an error in at
least one of the methods.

George