sci.physics.particle

On Feb 27, 4:33 am, "" <...@> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 9:12 pm, Igor wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 26, 2:32 am, "" <...@> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 25, 8:24 pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 23, 11:46 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
>
> > > > > Why " Igor " ( instead of Tom Hoovler ) ?
>
> > > > It's a long crazy story, but it relates to this campy '60s movie:
>
> > > >/title/tt0059124/
>
> > > ----------------------
> > > i asked
> > > who is nominating the moderators
>
> > > so now i understand that ................
> > > they are nominating THEMSELVES !!! (:-)
>
> > > and do not let ousiders to get it
>
> > > so now we canunderstand the real worth of that ng !!
> > > as an advancing tool for physics
> > > (a chorus of parrots of the ' church '....)
> > > so let everyone know the real facts
> > >
> > > ---------------------
>
> > Since you'll never be mistaken for a person who understands any real
> > physics, I probably wouldn't worry too much about it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ---------------
> you dont worry about anything !!(except your pomous ego)
> and that is why you will never be
> a pioneer physicist...]
> (unless you will parctice your good plagiatory skills .. (:-)
>
> keep well
> -

Funny, but no matter how much I try to ignore it, it seems to keep
droning on and on and says absolutely nothing.