sci.physics

On Oct 3, 6:43 pm, Benj wrote:
> Roger Coppock wrote:
> > Nope! CO2 was not steadily increasing at ppmv/year.
> > Here are the facts.
>
> > /rcoppock/
>
> > /gmd/webdata/ccgg/trends/
>
> > Atmospheric CO2 concentrations were then, and are now,
> > increasing exponentially.
>
> Liars - statistics!
>
> I see that you've suppressed the zero on these data to make them way
> more dramatic than they are! 315 to 380 is an "exponential" growth?
> Hardly. If you plotted the data with the zero in the right place you
> couldn't tell what kind of change it is. And give you are only looking
> at a piece of it and it oscillates, it damn well could be linear. So
> Gosh, you and Algore lied to us. No surprise there. He's a politician.
> You can tell if he's lying by simply checking to see if his lips are
> moving. What's your excuse?
>
> The REAL facts are that the increase in CO2 concentrations are due to
> rising ocean temperatures (which CANNOT be due to man-made CO2 cause
> and effect have been reversed) that cause it to give up more CO2. Just
> WHAT is you political agenda with this issue? We'd really like to know!

It's you that are the liar.

Ocean temperatures rise, because there is more heat for them to
absorb, since the CO2 is keeping it from escaping.

Glaciers melt for the same reason.

The destruction of the Amazon puts more pressure on the same.

Apparently your political agenda is to flood coastal cities and
Netherlands in order to do away with the liberals. But that shows just
how stupid you are.

The liberals who'd go to your red states will change them beyond
recognition.

And idiots like you will lose all power you have.