sci.physics

"Timothy Golden " wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Sep 9, 10:12 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
>> "Timothy Golden " wrote in
>> messagenews: @ ...
>>
>> > On Sep 8, 11:29 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
>> >> "Timothy Golden " wrote in
>> >> messagenews: @ ...
>>
>> >> >> How can there be motion without time? I once read a nice little
>> >> >> 'definition' (to paraphrase): Time is that which allows things to
>> >> >> change.
>>
>> >> > In building a unidirectional numerical system that matches time one
>> >> > can come to understand that time is zero dimensional:
>>
>> >> Nonsense
>>
>> > Your criticism lacks content.
>>
>> So does your website
>
> It may be that you do not understand what you are reading.

I understand. Its a load of rubbish.

You simply confuse signs with dimensions and go downhill from there.

Perhaps you've never heard of such things as natural numbers or counting
numbers .. these do not have signs. There is nothing new and wonderful
abount numbers not having a sign. Either they are signed (have a plus or
minus) or not signed (plus only). Your arbitrary decision to introduce more
signs is simply making adding extra dimensions. There is nothing new about
that either.