sci.physics.relativity

On Sep 9, 10:12 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
> "Timothy Golden " wrote in messagenews: @ ...
>
> > On Sep 8, 11:29 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
> >> "Timothy Golden " wrote in
> >> messagenews: @ ...
>
> >> >> How can there be motion without time? I once read a nice little
> >> >> 'definition' (to paraphrase): Time is that which allows things to
> >> >> change.
>
> >> > In building a unidirectional numerical system that matches time one
> >> > can come to understand that time is zero dimensional:
>
> >> Nonsense
>
> > Your criticism lacks content.
>
> So does your website

It may be that you do not understand what you are reading.
It may also be true that my website is lacking content yet it is the
best that I can do.
The polysign topic is presented in a way that I believe is legible to
a nonmathematical person who is familiar with the real numbers at a
grade school level. Sum and product in general sign are defined. These
are consistent with the traditional math as two-signed numbers(P2). So
the transition is not so challenging. To challenge the view of P2 as
unquestionably fundamental. They are not fundamental under the
polysign constuction. It is evident that the complex numbers are as
fundamental as the real numbers and have no additional rules.
Traditional math has not found this because sign has never been
generalized. The gains of the polysign system are considerable. Were
it not for these consequential details I do think that a generalized
sign might be worth neglecting. Instead I see staggering consequences.
It is not I who is staggered- it is the traditional math that has been
staggering around with a staircased dimensional design. These maths
coexist and I do not discount the Cartesian thinking completely.
Still, under the polysign construction dimension can be taken from
signature. This is radically different and the underlying geometry is
subtly different. See for instance
/PolySigned/Lattice/

I am sincerely curious what your substantial criticism is since that
will help me to revise. However the one-line rejection that you
communicate is not helpful and if anything does not reflect well on
your own internet presence. Will Mr. Hyde step forward?

-Tim