sci.physics

In article < $ @trndny05>, junkmail608
@ says...
> "Henry" <9-11@ > wrote in message
> > And since that failure was insant, total, and symmetric
> > in WTC7, we know for a fact
>
> In the words of Inigo Montoya, "You keep using that word. I don't think it
> means what you think it means."
>
> > The gradual heating of steel weakens
> > steel gradualy, not instantly and totaly.
>
> True. So what? What happens when steel gradually weakens?
>
> > Nothing but demolition
> > ever has or can cause that sort of failure.
>
> So I'd only need one example to convince you you were wrong?
>
> > - Frank Legge ( .): the rate of descent of WTC 7 almost equals
> > gravitational free fall
>
> Puhleese, can we stop trotting out Mr. Legge as some sort of physics or
> engineering expert. His PhD is in Chemistry.
>
>
>

I wonder why there seems to be such a shortage of people who believe in
the demo theory with actual expertise in building construction?

You have chemists, preachers, etc, but very few, if any structural
engineers. Maybe one or two, but there are that many kooks in any large
group of people.

I wonder why?

ROTFL

BDK