sci.physics.relativity

On 2 Okt, 23:38, Eric Gisse < ...@ > wrote:
> On 2 Oct 2007 08:20:42 -0700, stevendaryl3...@ (Daryl
>
>
>
>
>
> McCullough) wrote:
> >Eric Gisse says...
>
> >>On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:26:42 -0700, ...@ wrote:
>
> >>>> That light travels at a constant speed is an experimental fact.
>
> >>>No it is not OWL never been measured, infact it is just plain stupid.
>
> >>Never?
>
> >> /home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/ ...
>
> >Eric, that section begins with the warning:
>
> >"Note that while these experiments clearly use a one-way light path
> >and find isotropy, they are inherently unable to rule out a large
> >class of theories in which the one-way speed of light is anisotropic."
>
> >I think that's what cranks who go on about one-way-speed-of-light are
> >referring to: You can't rule out the possibility that light has speed
> >c+x in one direction and c-x in the other direction. Of course, Occam's
> >razor might be used to argue that if the quantity x is unmeasurable,
> >then the simplest theory is to use x=3D0.
>
> I know that, but what amazes me is how _sure_ some folks are that one
> way light speed is something other than c despite no known experiment
> agreeing with them.
>
> I pile such theories in the same group as theories like "The universe
> is /really/ Euclidean but little demons force everything to behave as
> if it is Lorentzian!".- D=F6lj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -

It is simpe logic deduction, invariant light is not logical compatibel
with reality. It makes a nonsense universe where events not agreeable
upon, not just by time but also by place and occurence.

If an event occur in one frame, logic and logic alone states that it
will occur in all other observer universes "frames".
Unfortunatly simple logic experiment rule out this option for
universes building on invariant light speed.

So why are you surprised?