sci.physics.relativity

On Feb 13, 8:41=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Feb 13, 3:42 am, "Sue..." wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 13, 7:32 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> > [...]
>
> > > > > Doppler shift, idiot. You see the same signal but it comes in slow=
er.
>
> > > > What is the doppler shift of 100 km of fibre optic cable ?
>
> > > Does Doppler shift magically go away if the transmitting medium is
> > > glass instead of vacuum?
>
> > That is an issue you might want to study before it
> > pops up on an examination, important to you.
>
> > "Transmission line"

/~urban/master/Theory/
>
> Now show me how this is relevant.

No... Ask your Mum for the money to take a course
in electromagnetism so you can hunt for the
doppler shift you claim a fibre optic line
(or any fixed length path) exhibits.

If that doesn't work, you might gain some
insight if you can learn why lamba appears
in these equations.

/wiki/Doppler_effect

Sue...

>
>
>
>
>
> > Enjoy!
>
> > Sue...
>
> > > > Sue...
>
> > > > > Or do you think webcams work on magic and are immune to fundamenta=
l
> > > > > physics?
>