sci.physics

On Feb 28, 8:54 pm, Michael Helland wrote:
> On Feb 28, 9:12 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 1:37 pm, Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 27, 4:39 pm, tadchem wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 26, 4:04 am, Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 25, 7:38 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 25, 3:00 pm, Michael Helland wrote:
> > > > > > [snip nonsense]
>
> > > > > > So have you studied any actual physics yet?
>
> > > > > Physics is a large and complex field of knowledge.
>
> > > > > I think a more precise question is:
>
> > > > > Have I studied the necessary fields (and sub-fields) one should have
> > > > > mastered to make the claims I have made?
>
> > > > > Eric, that is a terrific question.
>
> > > > > I think I could answer your question if I knew which of my claims you
> > > > > found questionable, and what their corresponding fields and sub-fields
> > > > > are.
>
> > > > > Thanks for the question. Good to hear from you. I hope you're well.
>
> > > > Sounds like a "No" to me...
>
> > > > After all, the question was "have you studied any actual physics?",
> > > > not "have you studied the relevant physics?"
>
> > > Then yes. I've studied physics.
>
> > > My hypothesis has to do with quantum and atomic physics, as well as
> > > neuroscience.
>
> > > I haven't studied any of those relevant physics.
>
> > So why the FUCK should anyone listen to a goddamn thing you have to
> > say about any of those subjects?
>
> Because sometimes science requires fresh territory to explore, instead
> of following the same paths and getting the same results.
>
> /
>
> You are decidedly mainstream. That's cool. That's your choice.
>
> That's not the only choice (unless you're trying to get good grades).

Its' the only choice if you want to make quantitative predictions.
Your brand of spew hasn't made ONE TESTABLE PREDICTION YET.

You have spent several years spraying successive iterations of your
nonsense here and you aren't one goddamn inch closer to being able to
replicate even the simplest and most easily tested predictions of
classical and modern physics.