sci.physics.electromag

"Bill Miller"
>> "Szczepan Bia³ek"
>>>>>>
>
> This reply is only slightly removed from a reply of, "I saw it written
> somewhere." If you would care to do your own research and supply us with
> appropriate antecedents, then I'll be happy to reply further. Otherwise,
> no.

I have always repeated: You are to work (you have possibilities) we are to
read. So I write about this what I have read.
>

>> If we assume that Unexplained = No equations.
>
> Nope. Equations be damned! We have plenty of those already. Unexplained
> means unexplained. There appears to be no physical explanation that
> adequately defines how come an antenna actually radiates.

Engineering and army people are not allowed to publicate. It is possible
that they know a little more.
>
> Yes, but if we understand HOW they work NOW, then it is entirely
> possible/likely that we can figure out how to make them work better.

And how to teach about them.

And what about my Absolute ground voltage?
S*