sci.physics.relativity

On Sep 19, 12:35 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> Hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult are usually obscure but, if I am
> not mistaken, below John Stachel clearly states that the theory of
> relativity is compatible with the emission theory of light:
>
> /chapters/
> John Stachel: "As a theory of principle (see above), the theory of
> relativity provides important guidelines in the search for such a
> satisfactory theory. Einstein anticipated the ultimate construction of
> "a complete worldview that is in accord with the principle of
> relativity."[25] In the meantime, the theory offered clues to the
> construction of such a worldview. One clue concerns the structure of
> electromagnetic radiation. Not only is the theory compatible with an
> emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of
> light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also
> requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an
> absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that
> radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain
> circumstances. He maintained that "the next phase in the development
> of theoretical physics will bring us a theory of light, which may be
> regarded as a sort of fusion of the undulatory and emission theories
> of light."
>
> Pentcho Valev

Pentcho, did you every bother to research the subject in which Dr.
Einstein received his first and only Nobel Prize?

Hint: It had nothing to do with either the Special Theory of
Relativity, or the General Theory of Relativity. Sometimes between
your pontifications, you may just be able to find time to read that
paper that earned him his Nobel Prize. I could share with you its
title and you could Google it for yourself, but that wouldn't be any
fun.

Still, here is a bit of a hint. Take a look at the Nobel Prizes in
Physics for 1921 awarded to Albert Einstein and shared with Niels
Bohr. Einsteins was for "his services to Theoretical Physics and
expecially for his law of the 'photoelectric effect'.

Many if not every real physicist believesthat Einstein should have
received a second Nobel Prize for his work on the 'Special Theory of
Relativity', but as most of us know, that honor was never granted.
Many of us believe that it should be granted today, since so much
practical work today derives from his simple but very profound
observations.

Pentcho, have you ever studied physics at a university level, or are
you simply another of the many web kooks that have literally ruined
by posting nonsense that they have learned from crap
popular texts on this newsgroup?

If you would like to have any credibility at all on , you
may want to cite the physics courses that you have taken an completed
at a university, and not from a mall bookstore. Otherwise, every
realizes that you are a cluless, non-thinking dork! In truth, most of
the physicists reading this newsgroup (if any others remain) have had
quite enough of your clueless vomit!

Harry C.



Harry C.