sci.physics.particle

On Aug 28, 12:06 pm, " " < ...@ > wrote:
> On Aug 28, 1:51 pm, panton_chrima...@ wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 28, 3:29 am, " " < ...@ > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 28, 6:18 am, panton_chrima...@ wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 27, 9:21 pm, " " < ...@ > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Aug 28, 12:41 am, panton_chrima...@ wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Aug 20, 5:18 am, " . Sommers" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Autymn D. C. wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Aug 11, 2:33 am, " . Sommers" wrote:
> > > > > > > >>Al in Dallas wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:35:37 +1000, "Jeckyl"
> > > > > > > >>>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>>>That doesn't mean there is a smallest one that is greater than zero
>
> > > > > > > >>>What else could "well-ordered" mean? Isn't that part of the definition
> > > > > > > >>>of "well-ordered"?
>
> > > > > > > >>Yes, it is, but the reals are not well-ordered. The proof that
> > > > > > > >>there is no smallest positive real is trivial. Assume the
> > > > > > > >>contrary, that there is some smallest positive real, q. Now
> > > > > > > >>consider q/10. This is also a positive real, and it is smaller
> > > > > > > >>than q.
>
> > > > > > > > That's not a proof at all. If there's a smallest real q, one cannot
> > > > > > > > consider any q/10 because there be no q/10.
>
> > > > > > > Don't be silly.
>
> > > > > > In her defense, she isn't trying to be silly - she is quite insane.
> > > > > > She must have been just let back out of the asylum.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thomas M. Sommers -- t...@ -- AB2SB- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > ------------------
> > > > > and what makes you say that scientifically important remerk
> > > > > after 8 days of silence ????!!
>
> > > > Hey, senile drooling old fool - I have a life, and better things to
> > > > do.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > ----------
> > > what a Chrismatic person !!!
> > > i am full of admiration for you ...
>
> > As you should be!
>
> > > expecially as a physicist
> > > and more as a human being (:-)
> > > btw
> > > how is your wife?? is she a pappy woman ?? (:-)
>
> > WTF is "pappy"?
>
> > > dont reply it is obvious !! (:-)
>
> > Is your wife still fucking the Palestinians next door in the refugee
> > camp?
>
> > > --------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> -----------
> anyone talkes from his private expereince ...

Yep - my private experience of pimping your wife out to Arafat and
Company.

> as you do
> pstychopath
>
> (:-)
> ---------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -