sci.physics.particle

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:52:38 -0700, " " < @ >
wrote:

>On Aug 25, 3:19 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
>> " " < ...@ > wrote in message
>>
>> news: @ ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 20, 3:27 pm, m...@ wrote:
>> >> When atoms interact with energy, energy is exchanged in units that are
>> >> multiples of Planck's constant. When atoms interact with other atoms,
>> >> the electron is the base "quantum" for chemical reactions. The rate
>> >> of current transfer is the same in both situations. It is simply the
>> >> time element that varies. If scientists choose SI units as the basis
>> >> of their measurements as in chemical reactions, then the value of
>> >> energy quanta will be a multiple of the amount of charge that moves to
>> >> the atom in a period of one second or one electron. If, instead, that
>> >> period is defined as the time interval to complete one cycle of a wave
>> >> oscillating at the resonant frequency of free space (equal to the
>> >> speed of light over the permeability of free space), then the amount
>> >> of transferred charge will be a multiple of Planck's Constant. The
>> >> relationship is described at:
>>
>> >> /Summary%20Sheet%20Kinetic%20Space%2...
>> >> Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > ----------------
>> > Very nice saied Mr M
>>
>> You don't, of course, understand what he said .. you just think he's
>> agreeing with your idea
>>
>> > now a question for you
>>
>> > considering what you saied above
>> > is
>> > a photon with a frequency of
>> > **one cycle per 100 billion years--
>> > can be considered as **sane **physics ??
>>
>> > TIA (only to Mr M from the above post)
>>
>> A meeting of the crackpots .. and Porat talks about sane physics .. what a
>> joke.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>----------------------
>the psychopath jekyle
>ddint notice that i adressed Mr M only

It's quite pathological to post to Usenet and claim to be addressing
only one person.

[snip bizarre drivel]

--
Al in St. Lou