Group: sci.physics.particle
From: "Y.Porat"
Date: Friday, August 10, 2007 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: Qm has tobe considered as an experimentaly limited Theory !!

On Aug 10, 10:36 am, " " < ...@ > wrote:
> On Aug 10, 10:20 am, " " < ...@ > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 9:52 am, " " < ...@ > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 10, 8:40 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
>
> > > > " " < ...@ > wrote in message
>
> > > >news: @ ...
>
> > > > >> There is no *physical* limit of photon frequency. There may be a
> > > > >> practical limit, but not one that is dictated by any physical law.
> > > > > -------------------------
> > > > > Mr PD
> > > > > you keep on *posing *!! to theach me physics
> > > > > so
>
> > > > That's because you know so litlte and are so confused. We're tryingto help
> > > > you
>
> > > > > what is according to you
> > > > > the most basic law of science ingeneral
> > > > > and specifically for physics science ???
>
> > > > Eh? Why are you asking such a vague philosophical question? Are you talking
> > > > about laws of science (like conservation of momentum), or "laws" about
> > > > science (like how scientific method works)?
>
> > > > Or are you just trying to divert this thread in some other tangent now. You
> > > > seem to do that (or go around in circles) whenever we show you where you're
> > > > wrong or mistaken .. which is quite often.
>
> > > ------------------
> > > i am th e last one hear that is interesyed to divert the issue
>
> > > i was asking it
> > > because PD was scrambling mathematical
> > > figures form his immagination!!
>
> > > so i ask every body who is readt to remind us
> > > what is th e most basic law of science?
> > > and not to mension of physics ??
>
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > --------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > -------------------
> > and now a quation that came tomy mind
> > as a result ofour thorough discussion here :
>
> > 1 a preemptive question:
>
> > what is th e samllest photon ever found experimentally ??
>
> > 2
> > and now the next question that seems to be unprecedented:
> > (talking about the 'descrete nature of photon energy )
>
> > so listen carefully and be attetntive ::
>
> > What is the smallest gap (difference )
> > eveR found **experimantally-!!**-
> > between a photon energy value and ..
> > THE NEXT CLOSEST ONE TO IT ??!!!
>
> > if not ever though t about
> > i think it is worthwhile tothing and look for it !!
>
> > TIA
> >
> > ----------------------
>
> > What is the smallest gap (difference )- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --------------------
> OHHH yes
> i forgot to tell you my prediction
> abou t what that value gap difference will be::
>
> it will be ......
>
> h times /time unit !!
> or a multiple ofthat value !!!??
>
> it is jsut a wild guess (:-)
> any way i am ready to taking on myself some risk
> by that guess
>
> ps
> i think a computer of a big university could do that job !!!
>
> copyright on that question and guess: ....10-08-07..
>
> TIA
>
> ----------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-----------------
and another Oh yes (:-)


a reletivistic condition:

all the tested above photon energy quantities
must be**
from the same reference frame of which they were created

ATB

---------------------