sci.physics.relativity

On Aug 9, 12:37 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
> " " < ...@ > wrote in message
>
> news: @ ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 9, 10:26 am, "Jeckyl > > but you stil ddint understood the
> > difference
> > > I understand just fine
>
> >> > so as long as you dont reject the claim of
> >> > the superfertz phootn as sound physics
> >> > i cant go one with you
> >> > we can go one only if we have a common language !!
>
> >> Lets see where you go then .. as long as its not flying cows :)- Hide
> >> quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > ----------
> > if you want to go furter with me
> > we muat agree that paractically
>
> Give it a rest and just get on with whatever it is you ar egoing to say
>
> > (not in sense as PD though that we can
> > boil a cuop of tea on it
> > but in sense of the capability of
> > curent experimental tools )
>
> > so 'practically'
> > there is a top limit to photon energy
> > (as only both of us alaready ageed )
> > and a bottotm limit to photon energy as well!!
>
> At any given time there is a lowest frequency / energy photon we can detect
> (until we built more sensitive detectors)
>
> But the lower limit for frequency and energy for a photon is zero .. but of
> course one can not reach it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-----------
so if it is zero
we cant develop my ideas futheer away
with you
my ideas are more about
to concentate about the aprticle
behaviour of photons
and as you know there ar eno aprticles
that are in any aspect zero

bye


---------------