sci.physics.particle

" " < @ > wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Aug 9, 10:26 am, "Jeckyl > > but you stil ddint understood the
> difference
> > I understand just fine
>>
>> > so as long as you dont reject the claim of
>> > the superfertz phootn as sound physics
>> > i cant go one with you
>> > we can go one only if we have a common language !!
>>
>> Lets see where you go then .. as long as its not flying cows :)- Hide
>> quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> ----------
> if you want to go furter with me
> we muat agree that paractically

Give it a rest and just get on with whatever it is you ar egoing to say

> (not in sense as PD though that we can
> boil a cuop of tea on it
> but in sense of the capability of
> curent experimental tools )
>
> so 'practically'
> there is a top limit to photon energy
> (as only both of us alaready ageed )
> and a bottotm limit to photon energy as well!!

At any given time there is a lowest frequency / energy photon we can detect
(until we built more sensitive detectors)

But the lower limit for frequency and energy for a photon is zero .. but of
course one can not reach it.