sci.physics.particle

" " < @ > wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Aug 9, 7:30 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
>> " " < ...@ > wrote in message
>>
>> news: @ ...
>>
>> > youcan make speculations as well
>> > in physics
>> > provided that you define it
>> > explicitly as SPECULATIONS
>> > you cant make
>> > extarpoalations of data
>> > without puting it **definitely and clearly**
>> > in the CATEGORY of *specualtions* !!!
>>
>> So . .what is your speculation going to be .. and will it be practical?
>
> -----------
> adabvnceis sciene is starting by specualtions

"adabvnceis" ?? WTH is that?

> i am happy you already noticed it
> but you stil ddint understood the difference
> between specualtions
> and experimaetal dada
> ans till extarpoaltion of data

I understand just fine

> so as long as you dont reject the claim of
> the superfertz phootn as sound physics
> i cant go one with you
> we can go one only if we have a common language !!

Lets see where you go then .. as long as its not flying cows :)