On Sep 2, 2:45 am, American
> On Sep 1, 5:50 pm, Alan Anderson
>
> > Sylvia Else
> > > American wrote:
>
> > > > I'f you can disprove wrong anything I've said, go for it.
>
> > > Didn't G=F6del have something of relevance to say in relation to that?
>
> > I'm more reminded of Wolfgang Pauli's comment: "It is not even wrong."
>
> Don't forget to obscure the original intent of the posting by
> redefining
> the definition of "it":
>
> "It" is a third-person neuter pronoun, and doesn't seem to hold much
> water, ., small ideas =3D small imaginations, so that
> time applied =3D wasted comment.
>
> The migration of electrons to and from an atom (as in solution,
> .) makes and negates ions continuously. Thus continually the
> external potentials and the nuclear potentials intercommunicate.
> This means that their vacuum engines continually diffuse. Any
> dimensioning of the external potentials will be passed into the
> nuclear potentials as a dimensioning action also. If certain
> conditioning vacuum engines are present in the external
> potentials, then the slow diffusion into the nuclear
> potentials begins to affect the nucleons and their
> interactions, the quarks comprising the nucleons, the
> particles such as pions continually exchanged between
> nucleons, etc.
>
> :// /Index/Projects/References/
>
> A
Can the prolate/oblate nuclei within the BI-IV quadrupole be
stretched by resonance pulsing at the nuclear magneton frequency?
(I'm assuming that the wavelength of the nuclear electric field
produced by protons in the nucleus can be stretched by magne-
tomotive force through the use of resonance positron pulsing
the BI-IV quadrupole with para-positronium, while simultaneously
stretching the electron cloud around the nucleus). Since protons
reside in an atom's nucleus, the resonance sequence decompresses
the g-field of the magnetomotive dipole part of the quadrupole,
forming a miniature event horizon around the circumference of
the electron cloud, which produces Cerenkov radiation. An
analysis of the decompression sequence reveals that in a decom-
pressing or nuclear magnetically pulsed regime, the underlying
shells must decompress before the valence shell adds its lone
proton to the 7p energy level in BI-IV.
The bandwidth of this type of operation would depend upon the
frequencies of the Bi-II 7th shell electrons, which correspond
to the LIIIPIIPIII shell(s) at angstroms at keV.
The inelastic scattering threshold for resonance neutron capture
is 901 keV. Inelastic scattering means that there is no recoil
of the neutron, ., the pulse probe is programmable at a
frequency and amplitude that is between the values of neutron
resonance capture (901 keV) and the neutron separation energy
( keV). Above inelastic scattering, which is above
901 keV, there is elastic scattering, which involves the
absorption (and emission) of virtual photons as electrons in
order to replace the electrons that become radiated as a
result of the polarized pulse sequencing. In addition to band-
width, there are the ionization potentials for Bismuth, which
includes the wavenumber conversion of 1 eV =3D cm-1 for
the neutral atom to +6 ions in eV: I= , II= ,
III= , IV= , V= , and VI= . Of course, the BI-II
dipole includes twice the ions, and the BI-IV quadrupole
includes four times the ions. So when there is ionic transfer,
there is also absorption, and consequential emission of virtual
photons taking place for each of the ionic energy levels.
Increasing a mass's "velocity" by using resonant bombardment
through the vacuum flux increases its interaction rate with the
virtual photon flux, causing time dilation (1/f), with accom-
panying stretched wavefront on the local geodyne. (Note: the
"geodyne" represents the decompressed wavefront). The change
of the interaction rate with the virtual photon flux represents
an increase in the masstime (or time dilation), increasing the
overall quadramagnetic synchronicity of the
decompressing g-field.
American