alt.sci.physics

< @ > wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Sep 6, 2:18 am, "Don Kelly" wrote:
> To start consider your first proposition- look at the equation for
> the
>> force between the conductors and the role of permeability in this
>> equation.
>> If you increase permeability by using a "bath" of ferrofluids then the
>> effect is obvious.
>>
>> For your second proposition- the use of magnetic conductors will have a
>> miniscule effect. Note that it is the integral of H around a closed loop
>> that is related to the ampere turns enclosed. Even if the conductor had
>> infinite permeability, it is only a very small part of the magnetic path
>> of
>> concern. Local distortion of the field may occur which might have a small
>> effect.
>>
> Presently only existence of the effect of the magnetic conductor is
> important
> and that it becomes experimentaly proven. It's magnitude has secondary
> importance.
> Have you performed this experiment and also the first one which you
> confirm
> them only theoretically?
>
>> As for the rest??????? It appears that you are trying to re-invent the
>> wheel
>> by putting corners on it.
>>
> Regards,
> Hamid V. Ansari
> hvansari at gmail dot com
------------
Magnetic conductor-certainly will have an effect-because it will have an
effect on the field in the vicinity of the conductor- I do not know whether
this will increase or decrease the force but, as I said, I would expect a
miniscule increase. Reason indicates this much. The problem that I expect is
that, in most cases, it falls within the margin of errors in experimental
work and necessary approximations in theoretical analysis (calculations from
theory will require approximations and y numerical field analysis).
As to the medium- think- what do you expect?

No- I haven't done measurements-presently neither the resources nor the
desire. Neither have you. You have set up a number of artificial
proposals -why? do you have an alternative theory that gives different
results in these cases than conventional theory?


--

Don Kelly dhky@
remove the X to answer
----------------------------

>