sci.physics.relativity

Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:44:38 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
> <@> wrote:
>
>> Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
>>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:05:29 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
>>> <@> wrote:
>>>
>
>>>> Ah.
>>>> 'The finely tuned cavity' which determine the frequency
>>>> of the hyperfine transition in the hydrogen maser of course!
>>> Any oscillator can be run off resonance.
>> Quite.
>> The Hydrogen maser in gravity probe A could indeed
>> 'run off resonance' by up to one part in 10^14.
>>
>>>> Well done, Henri.
>>>> This was indeed even better.
>>>>
>>>> But keep keeping it up, Henri.
>>>> I am sure you can do even better.
>>>> You have reached the Moon, but the sky is the limit!
>>> You obviously have no sensible answer.
>>> The cavity becomes detuned in free fall.
>> Of course, Henri.
>> And what's more; the 'free fall detuning' depend
>> on the altitude and speed exactly as predicted by GR.
>> Accidental, of course.
>>
>>> So?
>> So your ignorance shows.
>>
>> This was a disappointing performance, Henri.
>> Out of ideas?
>>
>> I am sure you can do better than this.
>> Remember, the sky is the limit.
>> Go for it!
>
> Paul, the experiment used doppler ranging based on constant light speed.
>
> The logic used is circular. It is a joke.

Giving up, Henri?
The 'bandpass filter changing the frequency' didn't work.
The 'cavity becomes detuned in free fall' didn't work.
No more amusing ideas of how to explain away the experimental evidence?
How disappointing.

So all you can do is to revert to the ol'
"Since gravitational blue shift of EM-radiation would falsify
the BaTh, and the BaTh _must_ be correct because I think it is,
the only possible conclusion is that any experiment observing
gravitational blue shift _must_ be false and not believable.
The logic used is circular. It is a joke."

--
Paul

/pb_andersen/