sci.physics.relativity

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:28:30 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<@> wrote:

>Max Keon skrev:
>> "Paul B. Andersen" <@> wrote in message
>> news:@...
>>> Max Keon wrote:
>>>> Eric Gisse wrote:
>>>>> Max Keon wrote:
>> ---



>> /maxkeon/
>> (Image dimensions can only be specified in html)
>>
>> That's another impossibility that is _blatantly_ obvious to
>> anyone with some measure of intelligence, by the way. Perhaps
>> you should think about that too.
>
>Sure, if you postulate that Galilean relativity applies,
>it is indeed _blatantly_ obvious impossible.
>
>That's why it is _blatantly_ obvious to anyone with some measure
>of intelligence that since frequencies and wavelengths factually
>are gravitationally shifted, Galilean relativity is falsified.
>
>You seem to have a lot in common with Henri Wilson. :-)

There is a simple reason why the GR redshift is the same as the BaTh one.
Along with the rest of its insanity, GR distorts space so that falling light
retains a constant light speed whilst BaTh does not promote such a delusion.

The end result is naturally the same....so are the equations.



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
/hewn/

Einstein's Relativity is easy to understand if one has the IQ of a parrot and a gullibility index >.