sci.physics.relativity

On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:08:07 GMT, "Androcles"
wrote:

>
>"mike3" wrote in message
>news: @ ...
>: On Sep 3, 11:25 am, "Androcles" wrote:
>: > "Uncle Al" wrote in message
>: >
>: > news: @ ...: Androcles wrote:
>: >
>: > : [snip]
>: > :
>: > : > Rabbi Albert Einstein
>: > : [snip]
>: >
>: > [snip crap]
>: >
>: > Fuckhead Jew.
>: >
>:
>: Insults are not a real argument.
>
>Of course not, but Uncle Stooopid is only artificially intelligent.
>
>
>:
>: Insults prove nothing but the weakness of one's case.
>: If you must resort to insult to argue a case, then
>: you have lost the debate, right there, period, end
>: of story.
>:
>: If *anyone* and I do mean ANYone, YOU included,
>: resort to insults, you have shown you are unable to
>: defend your position through rational argument.
>:
>: Concession accepted.
>
>I'd agree with you if there were a debate to win, but the blatant
>denial of verifiable facts isn't recognisably "debate" in anyone's
>book, it's bigotry. Bigots should be insulted vociferously just
>for the fun of it.
>
>Which fact do you wish to debate?


Androcles, answer the question in the sig.
w.
--
An Empirical Question for the anti-relativists:
What is the GPS carrier modulation signal frequency?
[ ] MHz (theor. unaffected)
[ ] MHz (rel. corrected)
[x ] (example for Androcles and hanson)