sci.physics.relativity

On Feb 21, 8:01 am, "Juan R." Gonz=E1lez-=C1lvarez
wrote:
> Eric Gisse wrote on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:48:57 -0800:
>
> > On Feb 21, 6:59 am, "Juan R." Gonz=E1lez-=C1lvarez
> > wrote:
> >> Eric Gisse wrote on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:16:11 -0800:
>
> >> As said to you many times. When i follow the guidelines
>
> >>/en/miscellaneouszone/
>
> >> i am not permitted to reply your nonsensical/wrong/unfair posts
>
> > If you can't handle criticism, don't post.
>
> Nonsensical/wrong/unfair posts on an unmoderated newsgroup do not count
> like criticism.

Which part of my response to you was nonsensical, wrong, or unfair?

>
> And your completely wrong, ill-informed, flagrantly biased anti-MOND
> posting on moderated newsgroup did not count like
> "criticism":

I'm "flagrantly biased" because I'm actually at least vaguely familiar
with observations that contradict it. I'm also "flagrantly biased"
because it strikes me as hypocritical that MOND proponents think that
it is OK to whine about dark matter but don't balk at at a theory that
is pure curve fitting with arbitrary functions which was promoted from
"curve fit" to "supposedly credible theory of gravity".

Gravitational microlensing blows MOND out of the water. Forever. Every
counter-argument so far can't see the forest for the trees. All I have
seen so far are arguments that completely ignore the Big Picture
imposed by the microlensing results and instead focus on littler
things like how Dark Matter might not be behaving exactly as was
originally assumed as if that makes microlensing results go away.

I'm not going to waste time coddling your weak ass personality which
can't cope with a modicum of criticism. If you bring forth a
convincing counter-argument I'll consider it, but until that happens,
my opinion stands. Go ahead and hide behind your asinine "guidelines"
when it suits you - I don't give a fuck.


>
> /group//browse_thread/
> thread/6ca5c9d3d638aa3c

My comment stands, and your comment is irrelevant. Of COURSE TeVeS
reduces to GR - the action corresponding to the metric is the same as
in GR. That is not interesting, new, or helpful.

You, for some reason unknown to me, appear to think that GR solutions
are acceptable even though the WHOLE POINT of TeVeS is to negate the
need for dark matter.