Group: sci.physics.relativity
From: Jerry
Date: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet

On Oct 5, 7:44 am, "Androcles" wrote:
> "Jerry" wrote in message
>
> news: @ ...
> : Hey Guys!
> :
> : For my very -first- Java applet, I thought I'd illustrate the
> : consequences of Ballistic Theory versus the Sagnac experiment.
> : /cephalobus_alienus/sagnac/
>
> Very good animation, Tom and Jerry. You've proved c+v and c-v
> and the changing phase relation. Just tape a paper window over
> the screen at any point on the circumference to see it. Well done.
> To improve the model, add the waves like this:
> /Sagnac/
>
> and allow a restart or continue indefinitely, like this.
> /Sagnac/
>
> In other words, Emission Theory predicts that the amount of displacement of
> the interference fringes is very much affected by the rate of rotation.
>

Sorry. The clear and unambiguous implication is that
the phase relationship between the forwards and reverse
beams is constant in Ballistic Theory.

BALLISTIC THEORY IS DEAD. ANDROCLES AGREES THAT THE
ILLUSTRATION IS ACCURATE.

Jerry