Group: sci.physics
From: Ian Parker
Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: Antigravity, our doom?

On 11 Sep, 12:49, malibu wrote:
> On Sep 11, 5:14 am, Ian Parker wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 10 Sep, 19:44, malibu wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 10, 12:17 pm, Ian Parker wrote:
>
> > > > On 10 Sep, 17:27, malibu wrote:> Now the matter will be transparent to gravity *in all directions
> > > > > except one*, meaning if there is a planet at
> > > > > one end of that line, and nothing at the other
> > > > > end, they will fall in that direction even if a much
> > > > > bigger gravitational attraction is right beside them.
>
> > > > > This is why UFOs move like a stone
> > > > > skipping; they point at one source for awhile,
> > > > > and then another source (sink, rather), and move
> > > > > just like tacking a sailboat, or like Spiderman webbing to
> > > > > one building and then another.
>
> > > > Quite clearly there have been no UFOs since LIGO started up! How can
> > > > you "push" without generating gravitational waves. I have already
> > > > spoken of the tremendous sensitivity of the equipment.
>
> > > What are these 'gravitational waves' you speak of?
>
> > > Describe them.
>
> > The basic tensor in free space (no gravity) is
>
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > -1
>
> > I am putting c=1 here.
>
> > If you put a quad^2 operaror onto this you get waves.
>
> > /wiki/Gravitational_waves
>
> > The reference puts the tensor into sherical polar form and derives a
> > retarded potential travelling outwads together with polarisation.
>
> > Maxwell's equations are derived from an electric potential which is a
> > scalar. Magnetism and Maxwell's equations arise with a similar Quad
> > operartor. However we start with a scar in the Maxwell case.
>
> > Maxwell (photon) spin = 1 (Dipolar)
> > Gravitational spin = 2 (Quadrupolar)
>
> > Note that the Earth only gives off 300 watts.
>
> > /events/PulsarTiming/
>
> > Pulsar timing. Can detect high frequency G waves.
>
> > /article/
> > reference
>
> > /nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1993/
>
> > This is the citation for the 1993 Nobel Prize for Physics. No direct
> > detection but energy loss in orbiting pulsars of the amount predicted
> > by GR.
>
> > They have not yet been detected but I am sure that that is only a
> > matter of time.
>
> > BTW - Pulsar times are extremely accurate. Not only has GR and G waves
> > been confirmed but pulsars are the only stars where Earth mass planets
> > can be oberved. No life of course. They resemble the core of
> > Chernobyl.
>
> > - Ian Parker
>
> One of the things stated here is that these waves
> travel at the speed of light- these 'distortions of the
> curvature of spacetime'- which distortion
> is caused by.............the presence of matter in any form,
> even crushed and pulverized into quarks or smaller.
>
> Why? - not answered.
> How? - not answered.
>
The assumption of a speed of travel of c leads to a pair of pulsars
approaching one and other at 7mm/day

/news/einstein/

No other speed gives that figure and that figure has been confirmed
experimentally to be correct. More recent result and more precise than
the Nobel Prize.

Gravity is associated with matter in any form. It does not matter
whether it is crushed quark, or even black holes.


- Ian Parker