sci.physics

> Ian Parker wrote:
> Let us do a dedanken experiment. Let us have a gravity shield and put
> a mass into it. We then go to a mountaintop, take the mass out and let
> it do work. We will have ahieved a perpetual motion machine.

Only if we assume the generating of the field does not need energy,
Let us have a H2 filled balloon and put a (equal to lift) mass into
it. We then go to a mountaintop...

>
> As I said you have stated the case in terms of Physics clearly, but I
> do think the origin of these myths should be investigated too.
Agreed, i got my answer and this is a very interesting topic.

Here are 2 videos of brown discs in vacuum.
/watch?v=Rp4hygoD3RU
/watch?v=0Ar10OAb4mw

The first is a 8mm of conducting vacuum experiments.
the second is a present day experiment. As you can see in the second
movie, and not so much in the first, there is motion in the vacuum.

So if possible, explain how this can be the case without gravity
involved.

and If we collectivly fail to answer this, we could try and see if we
can come up with an answer to what qualities, gravity Must have, to
enable interaction with electro(magnetic) fields in this manner. And
in what way gravity would have to be manipulated, to achieve the
propulsive effect.
(Mechanics of biefield brown discs are that of a HV asymetric
capacitor)