sci.physics.particle

"Autymn D. C." wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Aug 29, 6:48 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
>> "Autymn D. C." wrote in
>> messagenews: @ ...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 6, 6:44 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
>> >> testing a set of 165 people to see who would get his question correct.
>> >> The
>> >> question pertained as to whether the weight of a moving body increases
>> >> with
>> >> speed. He is all for mass = proper mass and this is the term in which
>> >> he
>> >> thinks in. Due to this he made an error in his assumption as to
>> >> whether a
>> >> moving body weighs more than the same body at rest. The purpose of
>> >> examining
>> >> weight is because passive gravitational mass "m" is related to weight
>> >> "W"
>> >> by
>> >> W = mg. Thus an increase in weight implies an increase in passive
>> >> gravitational mass, which has the same value as inertial mass (aka
>> >> relativistic mass).
>>
>> > massum = weiht
>> > pondum = heft
>>
>> If this was supposed to be a clever play in words then you lost me.
>
> Gravitational forse is heft, as in heaviness, that which one heaves.
> Inertial cargo is weiht, therefore.

Sorry. I still don't see your point. You're comments are quite unclear and
disconnected. Is English your primary language??

Pete

Pete