Group: sci.physics.particle
From: "Jeckyl"
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass

"Autymn D. C." wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Aug 6, 12:24 am, The TimeLord
> wrote:
>> Pmb wrote in :
>> > My own, unpublished, version is at
>> > /physics_world/
>>
>> OpenOffice , cool! However, in table 2, the "Pro-Relativistic Mass"
>> column is wrong. I don't know anything about the "Con-Relativistic
>> Mass" column since each view seems to depend on the "Con" person's
>> view. Here are some ways you can correct the "Pro" column:
>
> Con means with, and is not the oppos of pro.

WRONG

see /browse/pro

pro /pro?/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proh]
adverb, noun, plural pros.
-adverb favor of a proposition, opinion, etc.
-noun proponent of an issue; a person who upholds the affirmative in a
debate.
argument, consideration, vote, etc., for something.

Compare con

[Origin: 1350-1400; ME < L pro (prep) in favor of, for; akin to per-, Gk
prĂ³, Skt pra]

see /browse/pro

con /k?n/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kon]
-adverb a proposition, opinion, etc.: arguments pro and con.
-noun argument, position, arguer, or voter against something.

Compare pro

[Origin: 1575-85; short for L contra in opposition, against]

And since when is "oppos" a word?

For someone attacking another poster for their (correct) use of English,
yours is terrible. Anyway .. you're nothing but a troll and a flamer. So
you can fuck off.