sci.physics

On Oct 7, 9:57 am, Peter Franks wrote:
> Roger Coppock wrote:
> > A single Atlantic hurricane season is not a global
> > climate change. To make claims about global climate
> > one needs three decades of global data.
>
> How many years of data do you need to make local climate claims?

But if you are claiming to have computer models capable of
prognosticating future climate trends which are not yet detectable in
statistics, you must have a perfect basis in the fundamental inputs.
This should be observable in the micro prediction of a hurricane
season. Otherwise you are merely making a guess with numbers which you
figure should be about right according to your persception of trends
and probability. For this you do not even need a computer.

Face the facts, Poppycock. The computer models do not have a complete
dynamic model. Although you assholes have always bitched about this
and demanded more money and more money for bigger and bigger
computers, as of right now you are still in failure of having any
climate models whatsoever that are of any value whatsoever.

So the twits of AGW make their scaremongering predictions 70 years
into the future and expect people to give them credibility. Just far
enough out that they hope to be safely in their grave when their
mental masturbation is clearly shown to be what it is.

KD