sci.physics.electromag

Dave wrote:
> When it has been peer reviewed and accepted in a well respected publication,
> then I'll believe they may have a new way of expressing Maxwell's
> equations... AND then when someone builds a device that actually
> demonstrates a new effect that is not explained by existing laws and has it
> reproduced independently and verified to work as described, I'll believe
> they actually found something unique.... BUT, I won't believe they found
> something actually useful until someone in China brings out a cheap knockoff
> of a radio or tv working on their principle!
>
> Call me a skeptic, but this sounds too much like existing patents for FTL
> antennas, free energy devices based on magnetic fields, the E-H antenna, and
> many other breakthroughs that have been overlooked by everyone else in over
> 100 years of experimentation and analysis of electromagnetic effects.
>
>
I couldn't have stated it more eloquently, Dave. Perhaps these terms
should be in upper case: PEER REVIEW and RESPECTED (science)
PUBLICATION. For some others there's always this unmoderated ng and
that light-night syndicated AM radio program "Coast to Coast." Sincerely,